4.7 Article

Long noncoding RNA GAS5 suppresses triple negative breast cancer progression through inhibition of proliferation and invasion by competitively binding miR-196a-5p

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 451-457

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.056

关键词

TNBC; GAS5; Metastasis; Progression; miR-196a-5p; FOXO1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81602319]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Start Program of the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang [BS1508]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered to be the most aggressive and lethal type of breast cancer. Many studies have suggested that the dysfunction of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) is correlated with breast cancer metastasis and progression. Here, we show that levels of the lncRNA, growth arrest-specific transcript 5 (GAS5), are decreased in TNBC tissues, and this down-regulation of GAS5 is associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype in patients, affecting clinical stage, lymph node metastasis and overall survival. Using an ectopic overexpression system in TNBC cells, we found that up-regulation of GAS5 can significantly attenuate proliferation and enhance apoptosis in TNBC cells. Through bioinformatics analysis and verification with qRT-PCR and luciferase assay, we found that GAS5 can bind to miR-196a-5p and there is a negative relationship between GAS5 and miR-196a-5p expression among TNBC patient samples. Furthermore, we demonstrated that overexpression of GAS5 can partially undermine the tumor promotion effect induced by ectopic expression of miR-196a-5p, including invasion and downstream FOXO1/PI3K/AKT signal pathway activation. In our study, GAS5 functioned as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) antagonizing tumor promotion of miR-196a-5p-expressing TNBC cells. These data suggest that GAS5 can suppress TNBC progression by competitively binding miR-196a-5p, therefore GAS5 may be a prognostic biomarker of TNBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据