4.7 Article

Protective effect of acidic polysaccharide from Schisandra chinensis on acute ethanol-induced liver injury through reducing CYP2E1-dependent oxidative stress

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 537-542

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.079

关键词

Schisandra chinensis; Polysaccharide; Alcoholic liver disease; CYP2E1

资金

  1. Jilin Pharmaceutical Industry Promotion Plan [20150309004YY, 20170309006YY]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Schisandra chinensis is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine used mainly as a recipe for hepatoprotection. Modern researches have revealed that the hepatoprotection is related to its lignans and crude polysaccharide. In this study, we examined the effect and mechanism of Schisandra chinensis acidic polysaccharide (SCAP) on the liver injury induced by ethanol. Main methods: SCAP was extracted with water extraction and ethanol precipitation. Liver injury models of both mice and HepG2 cells were produced by ethanol. The liver index, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in serum of the mice and cell culture supernatant were examined; HE staining was performed for observing pathological changes of liver. The malondialdehyde (MDA) level and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in serum, liver tissue and HepG2 cells, and triglyceride (TG) content in liver tissue were tested. Western blot was conducted to determine cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) expression in liver tissue of mice and HepG2 cells. Key findings: SCAP significantly reduced serial AST and ALT levels in the injuried liver and HepG2 cells induced by ethanol and also decreased TG level in the liver tissue. SCAP also obviously improved the hepatopathological changes and decreased MDA level as well as increased SOD activities in the serum, liver tissue and HepG2 cells induced by ethanol. Furthermore, Western blot analysis indicated that SCAP significantly inhibited the upregulation of CYP2E1 protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据