4.6 Article

Automatic seizure detection by modified line length and Mahalanobis distance function

期刊

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 279-287

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2018.05.004

关键词

Intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG); Seizure detection; Line length; Mahalanobis distance function; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; Time complexity

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [BT/PR7666/MED/30/936/2013]
  2. Indian Statistical Institute [SSIU-030-2014-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Automatic seizure detection with high accuracy and in linear time has profound implications on therapeutic intervention mechanisms. In this work taking into account 12 popular seizure detection algorithms we have shown that line length is one feature that is extractable in linear time from EEG signals and capable of automatic seizure onset detection with highest accuracy among linear time extractable features. Also line length is less prone to give false positives. The detection accuracy has been ascertained by ROC curve analysis on Freiburg Seizure Prediction Project data containing intracranial EEG recordings of 87 seizures from 21 patients with sufficient interictal signals. Next, we have modified the classical line length feature extraction algorithm to improve its accuracy without any additional computational burden. Finally, we have applied both classical line length (LL) and modified line length (MLL) on all focal channels and detected seizures on multidimensional focal channel signals by Mahalanobis distance function (MDF). Both detected 73 out of 87 seizures. Area under the ROC curve (AUC), detection delay and false positive for LL and MLL are 0.951, 11.903 s, 0.201/h and 0.954, 11.698 s, 0.198/h respectively. Since LL has already been incorporated into an FDA approved commercially available closed loop intervention system, even this minute improvement may have significant healthcare implications. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据