4.4 Article

Development, validation and comparison of surrogate matrix and surrogate analyte approaches with UHPLC-MS/MS to simultaneously quantify dopamine, serotonin and -aminobutyric acid in four rat brain regions

期刊

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4276

关键词

endogenous neurotransmitters; surrogate analyte; surrogate matrix; UHPLC-MS; MS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81603326]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As biomarkers, endogenous neurotransmitters play critical roles in the process of neuropsychiatric diseases, and neurotransmitter levels in different brain regions can contribute to neurological disease diagnosis and treatment. Due to the lack of a blank matrix for endogenous neurotransmitters, surrogate-matrix and surrogate-analyte approaches have been used for the determination of neurotransmitters to solve this problem. In this study, we capitalised on the high accuracy, precision, and throughput of UHPLC-MS/MS and developed new methods based on the two approaches. Both approaches satisfied FDA and EMA validation criterias after an appropriate parallelism assessment, and they were used to further quantify the three endogenous neurotransmitters, including dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) and -aminobutyric acid (GABA) in rat brain four regions (cortex, striatum, hypothalamus and hippocampus) which represent the catecholamines, indolamines, and amino acids, respectively. Comparison of the results in the same rats (n=10) showed there was no significant difference in DA, 5-HT, or GABA levels between the two approaches (P > 0.05). The concentrations of DA and GABA were highest in striatum and hypothalamus, respectively, and the levels of 5-HT were paralleled in striatum and hippocampus almost 2-fold higher than other regions. This is the first study to compare these two approaches in the determination of endogenous neurotransmitter content in the rat brain, and the surrogate-matrix approach proved to be simple, rapid, and reliable, considering cost, matrix similarity, and practicality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据