4.4 Article

Simultaneous measurement of NAD metabolome in aged mice tissue using liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry

期刊

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4205

关键词

aging; metabolomics; NAD

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) [16K21051, 17K08653]
  2. Life Science Foundation of Japan
  3. Japan Society of Nutrition and Food Science
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [17 K08653, 16 K21051]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K08653] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) is a major co-factor that mediates multiple biological processes including redox reaction and gene expression. Recently, NAD metabolism has received considerable attention because administration of NAD precursors exhibited beneficial effects against aging-related metabolic disorders in animals. Although numerous studies have reported that NAD levels decline with aging in multiple animal tissues, the pathway and kinetics of NAD metabolism in aged organs are not completely understood. To determine the NAD metabolism upon aging, we developed targeted metabolomics based on an LC/MS/MS system. Our method is simple and applicable to crude biological samples, including culture cells and animal tissues. Unlike a conventional enzymatic cycling assay, our approach can determine NAD and NADH (reduced form of NAD) by performing a single sample preparation. Further, we validated our method using biological samples and investigated the alteration of the NAD metabolome during aging. Consistent with previous reports, the NAD levels in the liver and skeletal muscle decreased with aging. Further, we detected a significant increase in nicotinamide mononucleotide and nicotinamide riboside in the kidney upon aging. The LC/MS/MS-based NAD metabolomics that we have developed is extensively applicable to biomedical studies, and the results will present innovative ideas for the aging studies, especially for that of NAD metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据