4.8 Article

Engineering nanoparticle strategies for effective cancer immunotherapy

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 597-607

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.036

关键词

Nanoparticles; Immunotherapy; Antigen delivery; Adjuvant delivery; Immune checkpoint

资金

  1. Mid-career Researcher Program [NRF-2017R1A2B2009271]
  2. Basic Science Research Program [NRF-2017R1A6A3A04011564]
  3. Brain-pool Program [171S-4-3-1871]
  4. Intramural Research Program of KIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer immunotherapy has been emerging in recent years, due to the inherent nature of the immune system. Although recent successes of immunotherapeutics in clinical application have attracted development of a novel immunotherapeutics, the off-target side effect and low immunogenicity of them remain challenges for the effective cancer immunotherapy. Theranostic nanoparticle system may one of key technology to address these issues by offering targeted delivery of various types of immunotherapeutics, resulting in significant improvements in the tumor immunotherapy. However, appropriate design or engineering of nanoparticles will be needed to improve delivery efficiency of antigen, adjuvant and therapeutics, resulting in eliciting antitumor immunity. Here, we review the current state of the art of cancer immunotherapeutic strategies, mainly based on nanoparticles (NPs). This includes NP-based antigen/adjuvant delivery vehicles to draining lymph nodes, and tumor antigen-specific T-Iymphocytes for cancer immunotherapy. Several NP-based examples are shown for immune checkpoint modulation and immunogenic cell death. These overall studies demonstrate the great potential of NPs in cancer immunotherapy. Finally, engineering NP strategies will provide great opportunities to improve therapeutic effects as well as optimization of treatment processes, allowing to meet the individual needs in the cancer immunotherapy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据