4.7 Article

Estimating biomass stocks and potential loss of biomass carbon through clear-felling of rubber plantations

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 88-96

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.019

关键词

Agroforestry; Allometry; Isometry; Tapping artefact

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, GOI [DST/ISSTAC/CO2-SR-224/14(c)-AICP-AFOLU-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When latex production declines after 35-40 y, clear-felling of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations is a common management practice around the world. Although clear-felling can lead to significant losses in system carbon (C), such losses have not been adequately quantified in rubber plantations in India. The objectives of this work are to (1) develop and test models for estimating rubber tree biomass and C storage in situations where diameter at breast height (D 1.3 m) cannot be measured precisely due to the tapping artefact, and (2) estimate losses in biomass C due to clear-felling of mature plantation. Five biomass estimation models were tested using a total of 54 trees destructively sampled from 35 to 40 y old plantations in North East India. Then the amount of biomass and the potential C losses following clear-felling were estimated. The tree biomass predicted by our models was within 0.2 and 5% of our measured tree biomass. The mean biomass was estimated at 376.9 and 23.9 kg per tree for above and below ground parts, respectively. On an area basis, total tree biomass was estimated at 286.1 Mg ha(-1), which was more than that under jungle rubber (147 Mg ha(-1)) but lower than the forests (384 Mg ha(-1)) in the tropical regions. According to our estimate clear-felling of mature plantation can on an average remove C at a rate of 135 Mg ha(-1), which represents most of the C stored in aboveground tree biomass. In order to conserve the biomass C and to maintain environmental integrity, we recommend selective felling of 20% of total growing stock starting from plantation age of 35 years and replanting at two year cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据