4.3 Review

Bone turnover markers and novel biomarkers in lung cancer bone metastases

期刊

BIOMARKERS
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 518-526

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1354750X.2018.1463566

关键词

Lung cancer; bone metastases; bone turnover markers; miRNAs; DKK1; IGFBP-3

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81770875, 81572639, 81370969, 81072190]
  2. Chengdu Bureau of Science and Technology [2014-HM01-00382-SF]
  3. Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2015FZ0059]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [SRFDP] [20130181110066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Lung cancer still remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Bone is one of preferred metastatic sites for lung cancer cells. So far, both accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of lung cancer bone metastases are difficult. Objective: This review aimed to evaluate roles of bone turnover markers (BTMs), microRNAs (miRNAs), dickkopf1 (DKK1) and insulin like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) in lung cancer bone metastases. Methods: We searched articles about these four biomarkers in lung cancer bone metastases mainly in PubMed. Result: The levels of bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (ICTP) and N-terminal telopeptides of type-I collagen (NTX) were reported to be significantly increased in lung cancer patients with bone metastases. ALP, NTX and bone sialoprotein were thought to be associated with prognosis of lung cancer patients with bone metastases. MiRNA-335, miRNA-33a, miRNA-21, DKK1 and IGFBP-3 were revealed to be novel biomarkers in lung cancer bone metastases. Discussion and conclusion: Current researches have revealed that BTMs, miRNAs, DKK1 and IGFBP-3 may be useful in diagnosis, prognosis evaluation or treatment of lung cancer bone metastases. More studies about these biomarkers in lung cancer bone metastases are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据