4.7 Article

Glycocalyx-Mimicking Nanoparticles Improve Anti-PD-L1 Cancer Immunotherapy through Reversion of Tumor-Associated Macrophages

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 2098-2108

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00305

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21504016, 91527305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immune checkpoint blockade by anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (alpha PD-L1) has achieved unprecedented clinical benefits in certain cancers, whereas the therapeutic efficacy is often hindered by immunosuppressive tumor micro environment mediated by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which leads to innate resistance to this approach. To improve checkpoint blockade efficacy, the amphiphilic diblock copolymers poly(mannopyranoside/galactopyranoside methacry-late)-block-polystyrene are prepared by RAFT polymerization, which are sequentially self-assembled into glycocalyx-mimicking nanoparticles (GNPs) to neutralize TAMs. It is shown that GNPs can be specifically internalized by TAMs via lectin receptors, which results in upregulation of immunostimulatory IL-12 and downregulation of immunosuppressive IL-10, arginase 1, and CCL22, indicating functional reversion of protumor TAMs toward antitumor phenotype. The reversion of TAMs is proved to be mainly controlled by suppressing STAT6 and activating NF-kappa B phosphorylation. In vivo therapeutic studies have demonstrated that GNPs significantly enhance the therapeutic efficacy of alpha PD-L1 cancer therapy by reduction of tumor burden. Moreover, combination therapies with GNPs and alpha PD-L1 greatly improve immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by reciprocal modulation of tumor-infiltrating effector and regulatory T cells. Notably, for the first time, our results demonstrate the reversion of TAMs and improvement of alpha PD-L1 cancer therapy by synthetic carbohydrate-containing nanomaterials. This research highlights a promising strategy for optimizing immune checkpoint blockade in cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据