4.4 Article

Sleep restriction undermines cardiovascular adaptation during stress, contingent on emotional stability

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 125-132

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.11.013

关键词

Sleep restriction; Cardiovascular adaptation; Stress; Emotional stability

资金

  1. Health Research Board of Ireland Project Grant [RHR493]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500892]
  3. State Scholarship Fund for Studying Abroad of the China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sleep loss is associated with increased cardiovascular disease, but physiological mechanisms accounting for this relationship are largely unknown. One possible mechanism is that sleep restriction exerts effects on cardiovascular stress responses, and that these effects vary between individuals. Emotional stability (ES) is a personality trait pertinent to sleep restriction and stress responding. However, no study to date has explored how ES and sleep-restriction interactively affect cardiovascular stress responses or processes of adaptation during stress. The present study sought to investigate the association between ES and impact of sleep restriction on cardiovascular function during stress, with particular regard to the trajectory of cardiovascular function change across time. Ninety female university students completed a laboratory vigilance stress task while undergoing continuous cardiovascular (SBP, DBP, HR, SV, CO, TPR) monitoring, after either a night of partial sleep restriction (40% of habitual sleep duration) or a full night's rest. Individuals high in ES showed stable and adaptive cardiovascular (SBP, SV, CO) responses throughout stress exposure, regardless of sleep. In contrast, individuals low in ES exhibited cardiovascular adaptation during stress exposure while rested, but disrupted adaption while sleep-restricted. These findings suggest that sleep-restriction undermines healthful cardiovascular adaptation to stress for individuals low in ES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据