4.6 Article

Influence of Rashba spin-orbit coupling on the Kondo effect

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 93, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.075148

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (Florida) [DMR-1107814, DMR-1508122]
  2. National Science Foundation (Ohio) [DMR-1108285, DMR-1508325]
  3. NSF [PHY-1066293]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1508325, 1508122] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An Anderson model for a magnetic impurity in a two-dimensional electron gas with bulk Rashba spin-orbit interaction is solved using the numerical renormalization group under two different experimental scenarios. For a fixed Fermi energy, the Kondo temperature T-K varies weakly with Rashba coupling lambda(R), as reported previously. If instead the band filling is low and held constant, increasing lambda(R) can drive the system into a helical regime with exponential enhancement of T-K. Under either scenario, thermodynamic properties at low temperatures T exhibit the same dependencies on T/T-K as are found for lambda(R) = 0. Unlike the conventional Kondo effect, however, the impurity exhibits static spin correlations with conduction electrons of nonzero orbital angular momentum about the impurity site. We also consider a magnetic field that Zeeman splits the conduction band but not the impurity level, an effective picture that arises under a proposed route to access the helical regime in a driven system. The impurity contribution to the system's ground-state angular momentum is found to be a universal function of the ratio of the Zeeman energy to a temperature scale that is not T-K (as would be the case in a magnetic field that couples directly to the impurity spin), but rather is proportional to T-K divided by the impurity hybridization width. This universal scaling is explained via a perturbative treatment of field-induced changes in the electronic density of states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据