4.3 Article

Transcriptomic analyses reveal genotype- and organ-specific molecular responses to cold stress in Elymus nutans

期刊

BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 671-683

出版社

ACAD SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC, INST EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
DOI: 10.1007/s10535-018-0812-5

关键词

abiotic stress response; brassinosteroids; jasmonic acid; RNA-Seq

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-34]
  2. major Project for Tibetan forage industry [Z2015C02N02]
  3. PhD research startup foundation of the Northwest AF University [2452017195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elymus nutans is an important alpine perennial forage of the Pooideae subfamily, which can survive subzero temperatures. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying cold tolerance in E. nutans, we performed the transcriptional analysis by RNA-Seq in two genotypes, the tolerant Damxung (DX) and the sensitive Gannan (GN), under cold stress. The new E. nutans transcriptomes comprised 200 520/200 836 and 181 331/211 973 transcripts in leaves/crowns of DX and GN, respectively. More cold-stress-related genes were identified in leaves than in crowns of both genotypes throughout the whole cold stress. The most prominent functional category in leaves of both genotypes at 3 h of stress was transcriptional regulation. Brassinosteroid and jasmonic acid mediated signalling pathways played central roles in regulating downstream protective responses in DX after 24 h of cold stress. Prolonged cold stress caused more severe transcriptome responses in crowns and leaves of DX compared to GN. The most significant transcriptomic changes in both genotypes were associated with the response to abiotic stresses and the oxidation-reduction processes, implying reprogramming of the cellular metabolism as an adaptation to cold stress. This study reveals mechanisms of genotype- and organ-specific cold stress response in E. nutans and thus provides a basis for future breeding strategies aimed at improving the tolerance of cold-sensitive plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据