4.7 Article

SEED 2: a user-friendly platform for amplicon high-throughput sequencing data analyses

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 34, 期 13, 页码 2292-2294

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty071

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LM2015055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Modern molecular methods have increased our ability to describe microbial communities. Along with the advances brought by new sequencing technologies, we now require intensive computational resources to make sense of the large numbers of sequences continuously produced. The software developed by the scientific community to address this demand, although very useful, require experience of the command-line environment, extensive training and have steep learning curves, limiting their use. We created SEED 2, a graphical user interface for handling high-throughput amplicon-sequencing data under Windows operating systems. Results: SEED 2 is the only sequence visualizer that empowers users with tools to handle amplicon-sequencing data of microbial community markers. It is suitable for any marker genes sequences obtained through Illumina, IonTorrent or Sanger sequencing. SEED 2 allows the user to process raw sequencing data, identify specific taxa, produce of OTU-tables, create sequence alignments and construct phylogenetic trees. Standard dual core laptops with 8 GB of RAM can handle ca. 8 million of Illumina PE 300 bp sequences, ca. 4 GB of data. Availability and implementation: SEED 2 was implemented in Object Pascal and uses internal functions and external software for amplicon data processing. SEED 2 is a freeware software, available at http://www.biomed.cas.cz/mbu/lbwrf/seed/as a self-contained file, including all the dependencies, and does not require installation. Supplementary data contain a comprehensive list of supported functions. Contact: daniel.morais@biomed.cas.cz Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据