4.6 Article

Pressure dependence of the magnetic ground states in MnP

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 93, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.100405

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy
  2. U.S.-Japan Cooperative Program on Neutron Scattering
  3. MOST
  4. NSF of China [2014CB921500, 11574377, 11304371]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB07020100]
  6. NSF [DMR-1350002]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  8. JSPS KAKENHI [15H03681]
  9. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Materials Research [1350002] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H03681, 26220711] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MnP, a superconductor under pressure, exhibits a ferromagnetic order below T-C similar to 290 K followed by a helical order with the spins lying in the ab plane and the helical rotation propagating along the c axis below T-s similar to 50 K at ambient pressure. We performed single-crystal neutron diffraction experiments to determine the magnetic ground states under pressure. Both T-C and T-s are gradually suppressed with increasing pressure and the helical order disappears at similar to 1.2 GPa. At intermediate pressures of 1.8 and 2.0 GPa, the ferromagnetic order first develops and changes to a conical or two-phase (ferromagnetic and helical) structure with the propagation along the b axis below a characteristic temperature. At 3.8 GPa, a helical magnetic order appears below 208 K, which hosts the spins in the ac plane and the propagation along the b axis. The period of this b axis modulation is shorter than that at 1.8 GPa. Our results indicate that the magnetic phase in the vicinity of the superconducting phase may have a helical magnetic correlation along the b axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据