4.7 Article

A rapid epistatic mixed-model association analysis by linear retransformations of genomic estimated values

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 1817-1825

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty017

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [31661143013, 31790414]
  2. State High-tech Development Plan [2011AA100302, 2013AA102503]
  3. Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_15R62]
  4. National Major Development Program of Transgenic Breeding [2014ZX0800953B]
  5. NIH [U01 DK085524, U01 DK085584, U01 DK085501, U01 DK085526, U01 DK085545]
  6. Wellcome Trust [076113, 085475]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Epistasis provides a feasible way for probing potential genetic mechanism of complex traits. However, time-consuming computation challenges successful detection of interaction in practice, especially when linear mixed model (LMM) is used to control type I error in the presence of population structure and cryptic relatedness. Results: A rapid epistatic mixed-model association analysis (REMMA) method was developed to overcome computational limitation. This method first estimates individuals' epistatic effects by an extended genomic best linear unbiased prediction (EG-BLUP) model with additive and epistatic kinship matrix, then pairwise interaction effects are obtained by linear retransformations of individuals' epistatic effects. Simulation studies showed that REMMA could control type I error and increase statistical power in detecting epistatic QTNs in comparison with existing LMM-based FaST-LMM. We applied REMMA to two real datasets, a mouse dataset and the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) data. Application to the mouse data further confirmed the performance of REMMA in controlling type I error. For the WTCCC data, we found most epistatic QTNs for type 1 diabetes (T1D) located in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region, from which a large interacting network with 12 hub genes (interacting with ten or more genes) was established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据