4.2 Article

Factors Influencing Medical School Graduates Toward a Career in Psychiatry: Analysis from the 2011-2013 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire

期刊

ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 255-260

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-015-0287-z

关键词

Medical students' career choice; Residency recruitment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Various factors influence choice of medical specialty. Previous research grouped specialties into controllable lifestyle, primary care, and surgical. This study compared factors influencing individuals to choose psychiatry versus other specialties. Methods Data came from the 2011-2013 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire. The authors grouped responses, ranging from no influence to minor, moderate, and strong influence, into psychiatry and controllable lifestyle, primary care, and surgical specialties and analyzed the data using one-way analysis of variance. Results The analyses included 29,227 students, of which 1329 (4.5 %) elected psychiatry; 10,998 (37.6 %), controllable lifestyle specialties; 12,320 (42.2 %), primary care specialties; and 4580 (15.7 %), surgical specialties. Students choosing psychiatry reported less influence of competitiveness, student debt, and salary expectations than those choosing controllable lifestyle and surgical specialties (p<0.0001) and more influence of work/life balance than those choosing primary care and surgical specialties (p<0.0001). They reported less influence of family expectations than those choosing controllable lifestyle specialties (p<0.0001). They reported more influence of fit with personality than controllable lifestyle, primary care, and surgical specialties (p<0.004). Conclusions Students entering psychiatry do not fit the traditional categories of controllable lifestyle, primary care, and surgical profiles, but fall between controllable lifestyle and primary care specialties. Recruitment efforts may need to address this different pattern of influences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据