4.7 Review

Genetic cartography of longevity in humans and mice: Current landscape and horizons

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.01.026

关键词

Aging; Healthspan; Heritability; GWAS; QTL analysis

资金

  1. NIA [R01 AG043930]
  2. NIH F32 Ruth Kirchstein Fellowship Program [F32 GM119190]
  3. Nathan Shock Center for Excellence in the Biology of Aging [U01 AG022307, P30 AG013319]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM123489, F32GM119190] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P30AG013319, R01AG043930, U01AG022307] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is a complex and highly variable process. Heritability of longevity among humans and other species is low, and this finding has given rise to the idea that it may be futile to search for DNA variants that modulate aging. We argue that the problem in mapping longevity genes is mainly one of low power and the genetic and environmental complexity of aging. In this review we highlight progress made in mapping genes and molecular networks associated with longevity, paying special attention to work in mice and humans. We summarize 40 years of linkage studies using murine cohorts and 15 years of studies in human populations that have exploited candidate gene and genome-wide association methods. A small but growing number of gene variants contribute to known longevity mechanisms, but a much larger set have unknown functions. We outline these and other challenges and suggest some possible solutions, including more intense collaboration between research communities that use model organisms and human cohorts. Once hundreds of gene variants have been linked to differences in longevity in mammals, it will become feasible to systematically explore gene-by-environmental interactions, dissect mechanisms with more assurance, and evaluate the roles of epistasis and epigenetics in aging. A deeper understanding of complex networks genetic, cellular, physiological, and social should position us well to improve healthspan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据