4.5 Review

Marine natural product peptides with therapeutic potential: Chemistry, biosynthesis, and pharmacology

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.08.014

关键词

Marine organisms; Bioactive peptides; Challenges; Peptide isolation; Biosynthesis; Therapeutic peptides

资金

  1. NIH NIGMS grant [P20GM104932]
  2. Department of BioMolecular Sciences, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Mississippi
  3. NIH NCCIH grant [1R01AT007318]
  4. KraftHeinz
  5. Biosortia
  6. Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina
  7. National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health [R01AT007318] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI036596, R21AI036596] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM104932] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oceans are a uniquely rich source of bioactive metabolites, of which sponges have been shown to be among the most prolific producers of diverse bioactive secondary metabolites with valuable therapeutic potential. Much attention has been focused on marine bioactive peptides due to their novel chemistry and diverse biological properties. As summarized in this review, marine peptides are known to exhibit various biological activities such as antiviral, anti-proliferative, antioxidant, anti-coagulant, anti-hypertensive, anti-cancer, antidiabetic, anti obesity, and calcium-binding activities. This review focuses on the chemistry and biology of peptides isolated from sponges, bacteria, cyanobacteria, fungi, ascidians, and other marine sources. The role of marine invertebrate microbiomes in natural products biosynthesis is discussed in this review along with the biosynthesis of modified peptides from different marine sources. The status of peptides in various phases of clinical trials is presented, as well as the development of modified peptides including optimization of PK and bioavailability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据