4.5 Article

Lipopeptide daptomycin: Interactions with bacterial and phospholipid membranes, stability of membrane aggregates and micellation in solution

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1860, 期 9, 页码 1949-1954

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.03.028

关键词

Molecular dynamics simulation; Force-field parameterization; Membrane-protein interactions; Aggregation; Lipopeptide; Amyloids

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  2. Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology Nanofellowship program
  3. Government of Ontario

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide effective against multidrug Gram-positive bacteria. Despite having a net negative charge, it is selective against negatively charged bacterial membranes. It has been established that daptomycin's antibiotic activity is based on directly targeting the bacterial membranes and that this antibacterial activity depends on calcium ions. Importantly, however, both the precise role of ions and the physical mechanisms responsible for daptomycin's action remain poorly understood. We investigate these issues using three types of molecular dynamics simulations: umbrella sampling free energy calculations for a single daptomycin, unbiased simulations for daptomycin tetramers, and unbiased simulations of micellation of daptomycin both in the absence and presence of calcium ions. The simulations are in the excess of 4 is. As the most important finding, we establish that binding of the calcium ions on the aspartic acid residues is the key to stabilizing daptomycin tetramers inside the model material membrane. These complexes are vital for daptomycin's antibacterial activity. In the absence of binding, the tetramer is not stable and moves slowly out of the membrane. We also demonstrate that in solution, micellation of daptomycin occurs both in the presence and absence of calcium ions, and discuss the similarities between the behaviors of daptomycin and amyloid peptides in membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据