4.7 Article

Inhibition of BET bromodomains restores corticosteroid responsiveness in a mixed granulocytic mouse model of asthma

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 222-233

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.05.011

关键词

BET inhibitor; Corticosteroids; Histone deacetylase 2; Mixed granulocytic asthma; Th2; Th17

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1438-019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by different endotypes/phenotypes. Th2/Th17 driven mixed granulocytic asthma is one of them and shows resistance to corticosteroid therapy. Bromodomain and extra terminal (BET) proteins are required for differentiation of Th17 cells which play a pivotal role in neutrophilic inflammation. Therefore, we sought to characterize the differential effects of BET inhibitor versus corticosteroids, and their potential synergism in cockroach allergen extract (CE)-induced mixed granulocytic (eosinophilic and neutrophilic) mouse model of asthma having Th2/Th17 endotype. Effects of BET inhibitor, ( + )JQ-1 alone and in combination with dexamethasone (Dexa) were assessed on airway inflammation as well as Th2/Th17 related airway immune responses in CE induced mixed granulocytic asthma. Markers of steroid resistance [histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2), and oxidative stress] were also assessed in the lungs of mice and primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs). BET inhibitor, ( + )JQ-1 abolished Th17 driven neutrophilic inflammation in CE-induced mixed granulocytic asthma. Dexa had limited effect on overall airway inflammation despite having significant reductions in Th2 driven immune responses. However, combination of ( + )JQ-1 with Dexa completely blocked both Th2 and /Th17 driven immune responses in the lung which led to significant reductions in eosinophils, neutrophils, and mucin secretion. ( + )JQ-1 also reversed CE and IL-17A-induced decrease in HDAC2 expression in murine and human airway epithelial cells respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据