4.7 Article

Mouse lung fibroblasts are highly susceptible to necroptosis in a reactive oxygen species-dependent manner

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 242-247

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.01.025

关键词

Cell death; Necroptosis; ROS; Mouse lung fibroblasts

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB815]
  2. BMBF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) have extensively been used to study necroptosis, a recently identified form of programmed cell death. However, very little is yet known about the role of necroptosis and its regulation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cell types naturally exposed to high oxygen levels such as mouse lung fibroblasts (MLFs). Here, we discover that MLFs are highly susceptible to undergo necroptosis in a ROS-dependent manner upon exposure to a prototypic death receptor-mediated necroptotic stimulus, i.e. cotreatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha, Smac mimetic and the caspase inhibitor zVAD.fmk (TSZ). Kinetic analysis revealed that TSZ rapidly induces cell death in MLFs. Pharmacological inhibition of receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK)1 by necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) or RIPK3 by GSK'872 significantly rescues TSZ-stimulated cell death. Also, genetic silencing of RIPK3 or mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL) significantly protects MLFs from TSZ-mediated cell death. Prior to cell death, TSZ significantly increases production of ROS. Importantly, addition of radical scavengers such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) or alpha-Tocopherol (alpha-Toc) significantly suppresses TSZ-induced cell death in parallel with a significant reduction of ROS generation. Consistently, BHA prevented TSZ-triggered phosphorylation of MLKL similar to the addition of GSK'872. Thus, our study demonstrates for the first time that MLFs are prone to undergo necroptosis in response to a prototypic necroptotic stimulus and identifies ROS as important mediators of TSZ-triggered necroptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据