4.6 Article

Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microbial fuel cells using Scopus database

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 51-60

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.05.002

关键词

Bibliometric analysis; Author keyword co-occurrences; Co-authorship; Microbial fuel cell; VOSviewer; Scopus database

资金

  1. Majlis Amanah Rakyat (Council of Trust for the People), Malaysia
  2. Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Johor (Johor Islamic Religious Council), Malaysia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rising demand for sustainable energy and the availability of abundant wastes have stimulated research efforts around the world. As a newly emerging energy-based technology, microbial fuel cell (MFC) has received a significant attention due to its broad range of applications. Therefore, understanding the topics of interest and broadening collaboration networks are necessary to advance the research development towards integrated efforts. In this bibliometric study, our aim was to evaluate the global research trends in MFC area based on publication outputs, co-authorships among authors and affiliated countries, and co-occurrences of author keywords. Using the Scopus database, a total of 4126 journal articles published between 1962-2017 were retrieved. Results have shown that since 2008, the number of publications increased by 100 articles every two years, resulting in the steady increase in the cumulative total publications until present. About 60% of the global total publications were contributed by researchers from China and USA, leading the other 70 countries/territories. Also, among the most productive university from each of the 15 leading countries, four were amongst the world's top 100 universities. In conclusion, recent progress in MFC research includes the following (but not limited to) (i) electrode materials incorporated nanotechnology, ceramic, and biochar; (ii) mathematical modeling (e.g. artificial neural network); and (iii) economic assessment and life cycle analysis. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据