4.6 Article

Aging impairs beige adipocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via the reduced expression of Sirtuin 1

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.136

关键词

Beige adipocyte; Aging; Mesenchymal stem cells; Sirtuin; Senescence

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science & Technology (MEXT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the body, different types of adipose tissue perform different functions, with brown and beige adipose tissues playing unique roles in dissipating energy. Throughout life, adipocytes are regenerated from progenitors, and this process is impaired by aging. One of the progenitors of adipocytes are mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which have recently become a promising tool for stem cell therapy. However, whether or not aging impairs the brown/beige adipocyte differentiation of adipose tissue-derived MSCs (ATMSCs) remains unclear. In the present study, we isolated AT-MSCs from two different age groups of donors (infants and elderly subjects) and examined the effects of aging on the AT-MSC brown/beige adipocyte differentiation ability. We found that none of the AT-MSCs expressed Myf5, which indicated the beige (not brown) differentiation ability of cells. Of note, an inverse correlation was noted between the beige adipocyte differentiation ability and age, with AT-MSCs derived from elderly donors showed the most severely reduced function due to induced cellular senescence. The impaired expression of Sirtuin 1 (Sirtl) and Sirt3 proved to be responsible for the induction of senescence in elderly AT-MSCs; however, only Sirtl was directly involved in the regulation of beige adipocyte differentiation. The overexpression of Sirtl impaired the p53/p21 pathway, thereby preventing elderly AT-MSCs from entering senescence and restoring the beige differentiation ability. Thus, our study represents the important role of Sirtl and senescence in the regulation of beige adipocyte differentiation during aging. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据