4.5 Review

The role of complex cues in social and reproductive plasticity

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-018-2539-x

关键词

Phenotypic plasticity; Sexual selection; Fitness; Reproductive success; Multimodal; Communication

资金

  1. Norwich Research Park BBSRC Doctoral Training Partnership [BB/M011216/1]
  2. Leverhulme Trust grant [RPG-2016-184]
  3. BBSRC [BB/H002499/1, BB/L003139/1]
  4. NERC [NE/R000891/1]
  5. BBSRC [BB/H008047/1, 1772360] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenotypic plasticity can be a key determinant of fitness. The degree to which the expression of plasticity is adaptive relies upon the accuracy with which information about the state of the environment is integrated. This step might be particularly beneficial when environments, e.g. the social and sexual context, change rapidly. Fluctuating temporal dynamics could increase the difficulty of determining the appropriate level of expression of a plastic response. In this review, we suggest that new insights into plastic responses to the social and sexual environment (social and reproductive plasticity) may be gained by examining the role of complex cues (those comprising multiple, distinct sensory components). Such cues can enable individuals to more accurately monitor their environment in order to respond adaptively to it across the whole life course. We briefly review the hypotheses for the evolution of complex cues and then adapt these ideas to the context of social and sexual plasticity. We propose that the ability to perceive complex cues can facilitate plasticity, increase the associated fitness benefits and decrease the risk of costly 'mismatches' between phenotype and environment by (i) increasing the robustness of information gained from highly variable environments, (ii) fine-tuning responses by using multiple strands of information and (iii) reducing time lags in adaptive responses. We conclude by outlining areas for future research that will help to determine the interplay between complex cues and plasticity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据