4.5 Review

The role of natural processes and surface energy of inhaled engineered nanoparticles on aggregation and corona formation

期刊

NANOIMPACT
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 38-44

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2016.06.002

关键词

Nanoparticle; Surface energy; Agglomeration; Corona formation; Pulmonary surfactant; Molecular dynamics

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [ES-000002, HL094567]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface chemistry of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) becomes more important as their size decreases and enters the nanometer-range. This review explains the fundamental properties of the surface chemistry of nanoparticles, and argues that their agglomeration and the formation of corona around them are natural processes that reduce surface energy. ENP agglomeration and corona formation are further discussed in the context of inhaled ENPs, as the lung is a major port of ENP entry to the body. The pulmonary surfactant layer, which the inhaled ENPs first encounter as they land on the lung surface, represents a unique environment with a variety of well-defined biomolecules. Many factors, such as hydrophobicity, surface charge of ENPs, protein/phospholipid concentrations of the alveolar lining fluid, etc. influence the complex processes of ENP agglomeration and corona formation in the alveolar lining fluid. These series of events occur even before the ENPs reach the cells. Furthermore, for systematic and mechanistic understanding of such interactions at atomic scale, we suggest that molecular dynamic (MD) simulations can represent a promising future direction for research of the behavior of inhaled ENPs, complementing the experimental approaches. MD simulationsmay provide important insights into the nature of ENP-biomolecular interactions at the alveoli. In this review, we want to draw attention of biologists working on ENPs to the importance of the relationship between ENP surface energy and particle size. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据