4.8 Article

Pex3 and Atg37 compete to regulate the interaction between the pexophagy receptor, Atg30, and the Hrr25 kinase

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 368-384

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1413521

关键词

Atg30; Atg37; autophagic receptor; peroxin; peroxisome; Pex3; pexophagy; receptor-protein complex; selective autophagy

资金

  1. HHS \ NIH \ National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [DK41737]
  2. UC San Diego Frontiers of Innovation Scholars Program (FISP) [P0034]
  3. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) [EMBO ALTF 1238-2014]
  4. HHS \ NIH \ National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [GM119571]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macroautophagy/autophagy is a highly conserved process in which subcellular components destined for degradation are sequestered within autophagosomes. The selectivity of autophagy is determined by autophagy receptors, such as Pichia pastoris Atg30 (autophagy-related 30), which controls the selective degradation of peroxisomes (pexophagy) through the assembly of a receptor-protein complex (RPC). Previously, we proved that the peroxisomal acyl-CoA-binding protein, Atg37, and the highly conserved peroxin, Pex3, are required for RPC formation and efficient pexophagy. Here, we describe how Atg37 and Pex3 regulate the assembly and activation of the pexophagic RPC. We demonstrate that Atg30 requires both Atg37 and Pex3 to recruit Atg8 and Atg11 to the pexophagic RPC, because Atg37 depends on Pex3 for its localization at the peroxisomal membrane. We establish that due to close proximity of Atg37- and Pex3-binding sites in the middle domain of Atg30, the binding of these proteins to Atg30 is mutually exclusive within this region. We also show that direct binding of Pex3 and Atg37 to Atg30 regulates its phosphorylation by the Hrr25 kinase, negatively and positively, respectively. Based on these results we present a model that clarifies the assembly and activation of the pexophagic RPC through the phosphoregulation of Atg30.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据