3.8 Review

The State-of-the-Science on Somatosensory Function and Its Impact on Daily Life in Adults and Older Adults, and Following Stroke: A Scoping Review

期刊

OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 27S-41S

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1539449216643941

关键词

somatosensation; adult; stroke; performance; participation; rehabilitation

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [307905, 1022694, 1077898]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT0992299]
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative in Cognitive Rehabilitation-Collaborative Award [220020413]
  4. La Trobe University Post-Graduate Research Award
  5. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  6. Australian Research Council [FT0992299] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1077898] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim was to identify and synthesize research evidence about how adults and older adults process somatosensory information in daily activities, and the interventions available to regain somatosensory function following stroke. We developed two interacting concept maps to address the research questions. The scoping review was conducted from 2005 to 2015 across Web of Science, AMED, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsychInfo databases. Search terms included somatosensory, perception, performance, participation, older adult, stroke, intervention, discrimination, learning, and neuroplasticity. Contributions from 103 articles for Concept 1 and 14 articles for Concept 2 are reported. Measures of somatosensory processing, performance, and participation used are identified. Interventions available to treat somatosensory loss are summarized in relation to approach, outcome measures, and theory/mechanisms underlying. A gap exists in the current understanding of how somatosensory function affects the daily lives of adults. A multidisciplinary approach that includes performance and participation outcomes is recommended to advance the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据