4.7 Article

The resilience of family farms: Towards a relational approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 111-122

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.013

关键词

Social-ecological systems; Social-ecological resilience; Farming; Agriculture; Poststructuralism; Relational; Europe

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management [PJ-Nr. 100939]
  2. France, Ministry of Agriculture
  3. research programme Assessing and reducing environmental risks from plant protection products - French Ministries in charge of Ecology and Agriculture
  4. Conseil Departemental de la Drome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Family farms play an important role in the European countryside, yet their number is steadily declining. This raises the question of what conveys resilience to family farms, i.e. the ability to persist over the longterm through buffering shocks and adapting to change. Within the current approaches to farm resilience, we distinguish between two perspectives: the first focuses on material structures and highlights the role of farm types and ecological dynamics. The second focuses on actors and highlights that farmer agency and wider social forces also play important roles. We argue that a third perspective, one focusing on relations, has the potential to overcome both the structure/agency and the ecological/social dichotomies. Indeed, a relational approach enables a closer analysis of how ecological and social processes interact to undermine or strengthen resilience. The approach also allows to identify the different relationalities that are enacted within a specific context, foregrounding diversity in farming. Furthermore, it highlights that relations are continuously made and remade, putting the emphasis on change, and on the wider patterns that enable or constrain change. A relational approach would thus contribute to overcoming a one-sided focus on states and stability, shifting attention to the patterns of relations that enable transformational change. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据