4.0 Article

Nurse-led multidisciplinary initiatives to improve outcomes and reduce hospital admissions for older adults: The Care coordination through Emergency Department, Residential Aged Care and Primary Health Collaboration project

期刊

AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 135-139

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12526

关键词

advanced practice nurse; aged care; coordinated care; emergency department; geriatrics; hospital avoidance

资金

  1. Commonwealth Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThis article describes the Care coordination through Emergency Department, Residential Aged Care and Primary Health Collaboration (CEDRiC) project. MethodsCEDRiC is designed to improve the health outcomes for older people with an acute illness. It attempts this via enhanced primary care in residential aged care facilities, focused and streamlined care in the emergency department and enhanced intersectoral communication and referral. ResultsImplementing this approach has the potential to decrease inappropriate hospital admissions while improving care for older people in residential aged care and community settings. ConclusionThis article discusses an innovative way of caring for older adults in an ageing population utilising the existing evidence. A formal evaluation is currently underway. Policy Impact: The nurse-led Care coordination through Emergency Department, Residential Aged Care and Primary Health Collaboration (CEDRiC) model of care can improve the health outcomes and reduce the health service costs associated with the care of older adults with acute illness. CEDRiC enhances the coordinated care of older people and reduces potentially avoidable hospital admissions. The current siloed funding models between the Commonwealth and the States and Territories require innovative cross-sectorial approaches. Practice Impact: Increasing the availability of skilled practitioners with knowledge in geriatric syndromes in primary care can potentially reduce hospital admissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据