4.7 Article

Results from the first use of low radioactivity argon in a dark matter search

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 93, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.081101

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-0919363, PHY-1004072, PHY-1004054, PHY-1242585, PHY-1314483, PHY-1314507, PHY-1211308, PHY-1455351]
  2. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-91ER40671, DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  4. Polish NCN [UMO-2012/05/E/ST2/02333]
  5. UnivEarthS Labex program of Sorbonne Paris Cite [ANR-10-LABX-0023, ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02]
  6. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1455351] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [1242585, 1314501, 1103987, 1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Physics [1455351] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid argon is a bright scintillator with potent particle identification properties, making it an attractive target for direct-detection dark matter searches. The DarkSide-50 dark matter search here reports the first WIMP search results obtained using a target of low-radioactivity argon. DarkSide-50 is a dark matter detector, using a two-phase liquid argon time projection chamber, located at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso. The underground argon is shown to contain Ar-39 at a level reduced by a factor (1.4 +/- 0.2) x 10(3) relative to atmospheric argon. We report a background-free null result from (2616 +/- 43) kg d of data, accumulated over 70.9 live days. When combined with our previous search using an atmospheric argon, the 90% C.L. upper limit on the WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross section, based on zero events found in the WIMP search regions, is 2.0 x 10(-4)4 cm(2) (8.6 x 10(-44) cm(2), 8.0 x 10(-43) cm(2)) for a WIMP mass of 100 GeV/c(2) (1 TeV/c(2), 10 TeV/c(2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据