4.7 Article

Real-time monitoring of atmospheric ammonia during a pollution episode in Madrid (Spain)

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 80-88

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.037

关键词

Ammonium nitrate; Ammonia urban sources; Traffic emissions; Wastewater treatment plant; Secondary pollutants; Secondary inorganic aerosol

资金

  1. PROACLIM project [CGL2014-52877R]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [BES-2012-056545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonia emissions play an important role in the formation of secondary inorganic aerosols. Road traffic is considered to be one of the main sources of ammonia in urban environments, although other sources have been identified. An experimental study was carried out in a suburban area of Madrid (Spain), in which high time resolution measurements of ammonia concentrations were obtained using Cavity-Enhanced Laser Absorption Spectroscopy. Mean hourly ammonia concentration during the study period of December 2014 to January 2015 was 2.17 +/- 1.70 mu g m(-3), with 9.3 mu gm(-3) being the maximum recorded value for a period of 10 min. Stagnant conditions dominated the measurement period and influenced the observed concentrations. Other gaseous and particulate matter parameters, including size-segregated mass concentration, particle number size distribution and aerosol chemical composition (non-refractory species) were monitored at the same site in order to support the data interpretation. No relationships with traffic-related pollutants were found, however, a nearby waste-water treatment plant was identified as the main source affecting the observed ambient concentrations of ammonia and aerosols. Ammonia emissions from wastewater treatment plants may be significant annual sources of ammonia in urban environments. High-resolution observations of air chemistry help to resolve emission inventories in urban environments, and improve the effectiveness of policy to reduce secondary inorganic aerosols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据