4.6 Article

Discovery of a jet-like structure with overionized plasma in the SNR IC 443

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 615, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832733

关键词

ISM: supernova remnants; ISM: individual objects: IC443; pulsars: individual: CXOU J061705.3+222127

资金

  1. ASI-INAF [2017-14-H.O]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. IC 443 is a supernova remnant (SNR) located in a quite complex environment since it interacts with nearby clouds. Indications for the presence of overionized plasma have been found though the possible physical causes of overionization are still debated. Moreover, because of its peculiar position and proper motion, it is not clear if the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) within the remnant is the relic of the IC 443 progenitor star or just a rambling one seen in projection on the remnant. Aims. Here we address the study of IC 443 plasma in order to clarify the relationship PWN-remnant, the presence of overionization and the origin of the latter. Methods. We analyzed two XMM-Newton observations producing background-subtracted, vignetting-corrected and mosaicked images in two different energy bands and we performed a spatially resolved spectral analysis of the X-ray emission. Results. We identified an elongated (jet-like) structure with Mg-rich plasma in overionization. The head of the jet is interacting with a molecular cloud and the jet is aligned with the position of the PWN at the instant of the supernova explosion. Interestingly, the direction of the jet of ejecta is somehow consistent with the direction of the PWN jet. Conclusions. Our discovery of a jet of ejecta in IC 443 enlarge the sample of core-collapse SNRs with collimated ejecta structures. IC 443's jet is the first one which shows overionized plasma, possibly associated with the adiabatic expansion of ejecta. The match between the jet's direction and the original position of the PWN strongly supports the association between the neutron star and IC 443.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据