4.7 Article

Acylcarnitines: potential implications for skeletal muscle insulin resistance

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 336-345

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.14-255901

关键词

fatty acid beta-oxidation; mitochondria; inflammation; oxidative stress; myotubes

资金

  1. CIHR [MOP57810] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01DK078328-01, R01DK078328-02S1, R01 DK078328] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin resistance may be linked to incomplete fatty acid beta-oxidation and the subsequent increase in acylcarnitine species in different tissues including skeletal muscle. It is not known if acylcarnitines participate in muscle insulin resistance or simply reflect dysregulated metabolism. The aims of this study were to determine whether acylcarnitines can elicit muscle insulin resistance and to better understand the link between incomplete muscle fatty acid beta-oxidation, oxidative stress, inflammation, and insulin-resistance development. Differentiated C2C12, primary mouse, and human myotubes were treated with acylcarnitines (C4: 0, C14: 0, C16: 0) or with palmitate with or without carnitine acyltransferase inhibition by mildronate. Treatment with C4: 0, C14: 0, and C16: 0 acylcarnitines resulted in 20-30% decrease in insulin response at the level of Akt phosphorylation and/or glucose uptake. Mildronate reversed palmitate-induced insulin resistance concomitant with an similar to 25% decrease in short-chain acylcarnitine and acetylcarnitine secretion. Although proinflammatory cytokines were not affected under these conditions, oxidative stress was increased by 2-3 times by short-or long-chain acylcarnitines. Acylcarnitine-induced oxidative stress and insulin resistance were reversed by treatment with antioxidants. Results are consistent with the conclusion that incomplete muscle fatty acid beta-oxidation causes acylcarnitine accumulation and associated oxidative stress, raising the possibility that these metabolites play a role in muscle insulin resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据