4.2 Article

Results of the Andalusian Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening Program, 5 Years After Implementation

期刊

ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 551-558

出版社

ELSEVIER DOYMA SL
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.03.013

关键词

Cystic fibrosis; Neonatal screening; Immunoreactive trypsinogen; DNA; Pancreatitis-associated protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis neonatal screening (CFNS), based on double determination of immunoreactive trypsinogen ([IRT] [IRT1 /IRT2]), has been available in Andalusia since May 2011. If screening is positive, a sweat test is performed, and if that is positive or inconclusive, genetic testing is requested. Objective: To analyze CFNS, based on results from the first 4.5 years of the program. Materials and methods: Prospective descriptive study of neonates undergoing CFNS. IRT levels, sweat chloride, and mutations were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0. Results: Between May 2011 and December 2016, 474,953 neonates underwent CFNS. Of these, 1,087 (0.23%) had elevated IRT2. Since CFNS was introduced, 73 cases of cystic fibrosis were diagnosed; 60 were diagnosed by positive CFNS, and 13 were diagnosed by other means. In one case, the patient developed a typical clinical picture of cystic fibrosis, but had not undergone CFNS at the decision of the parents; the remaining 12 had a negative CFNS (false negatives). Of these, one patient was diagnosed before symptoms developed, as his twin brother had a positive CFNS result; another had chloride at the upper limit of normal, and was subsequently diagnosed with genetic testing before symptoms appeared; and 10 patients developed clinical signs and symptoms. Excluding patients with meconium ileus, sensitivity and specificity of the CFNS program were 85.71% and 99.78%, respectively. The incidence of the disease in Andalusia is 1/6,506 live births. Conclusion: These results are a basis for reflection on possible areas for improvement of the CFNS algorithm, and thought may be given to the introduction of genetic studies to increase sensitivity and reduce false positives. (C) 2018 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据