4.5 Article

An Experimental and Computational Investigation of Bone Formation in Mechanically Loaded Trabecular Bone Explants

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 1191-1203

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1378-4

关键词

Bone marrow multipotent stromal cells; Bone tissue engineering; Bone marrow; Fluid structure interaction; Shear stress; Bioreactor; Marrow

资金

  1. Irish Research Council, under the EMBARK program
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [CMMI 1100207]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland under the Short Term Travel Fellowship
  4. ORS under the Collaborative Exchange Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how bone marrow multipotent stromal cells (MSCs) contribute to new bone formation and remodeling in vivo is of principal importance for informing the development of effective bone tissue engineering strategies in vitro. However, the precise in situ stimuli that MSCs experience have not been fully established. The shear stress generated within the bone marrow of physiologically loaded samples has never been determined, but could be playing an important role in the generation of sufficient stimulus for MSCs to undergo osteogenic differentiation. In this study fluid structure interaction (FSI) computational models were used in conjunction with a bioreactor which physiologically compresses explanted trabecular bone samples to determine whether MSCs can be directly stimulated by mechanical cues within the bone marrow. Experimentally loaded samples were found to have greater osteogenic activity, as verified by bone histomorphometry, compared to control static samples. FSI models demonstrated a linear relationship between increasing shear stress and decreasing bone volume. The FSI models demonstrated that bone strain, not marrow shear stress, was likely the overall driving mechanical signal for new bone formation during compression. However, the shear stress generated in the models is within the range of values which has been shown previously to generate an osteogenic response in MSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据