4.5 Article

Elevated platelet counts in a cohort of children with moderate-severe osteogenesis imperfecta suggest that inflammation is present

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
卷 103, 期 8, 页码 767-771

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313859

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Elevated platelet counts are observed in cancer, autoimmunity and inflammation with concurrent illness. Proinflammatory cytokines are elevated in murine osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) models. We hypothesised that platelet counts might be elevated in children with moderate-severe OI. Methods We reviewed the hospital records of 71 children with moderate-severe OI, treated in the Sheffield Children's Hospital's Severe, Complex and Atypical Osteogenesis Imperfecta Highly Specialised Service. Data relating platelet count (below/above average, above upper limit) to prior and concurrent events were summarised as event proportions per child. Additionally, we created platelet SD scores to assess age and time-related trends, and relationship with OI type. Results 1206 platelet counts were recorded. Platelet SD scores were right-shifted by 0.89 SD overall. 49 of 71 (69%) patients had at least one platelet count above the normal range and 246 (20.4%) of all counts were above the upper limit of normal. Of these, 101 (41%) were high despite no confounding factors being present. For the 47 children with data at age less than 2 years, 89 (30.0%) platelet counts were above the upper limit of normal and 39 (44%) had no associated confounding factor. Elevated platelet counts were recorded most often for children with new or existing vertebral fractures. Conclusions Raised platelet counts were observed in association with new and healing vertebral fractures, but also (41%-44%) in the absence of identified proinflammatory factors or events. We speculate that these findings are evidence for a proinflammatory component to OI that could be a target for therapeutic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据