4.7 Article

Failure characteristics of jointed rock-like material containing multi-joints under a compressive-shear test: Experimental and numerical analyses

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.acme.2017.12.003

关键词

Intermittent joints; Rock-like material; Compressive-shear loading; Failure loads; Coalescence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11772358, 51774322, 51474249, 51404179, 51274249]
  2. Programme for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  3. Graduate student innovation project of Central south university [2015zzts074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extensive efforts have been made to gain a better understanding of the failure behaviour of rocks and rock-like materials, but crack propagation and failure processes under compressive-shear loading have not yet been comprehensively investigated. To address this area of research, the peak shear strengths (tau) and failure processes of specimens with multiple joints are studied by lab testing and particle flow code (PFC2D). Four types of failure modes are observed: (a) shear failure through a plane (Mode-I), (b) intact shear failure (Mode-II), (c) oblique shear crack connection failure (Mode-III), and (d) stepped path failure (Mode-IV). The failure mode gradually transformed to Mode-III as alpha (joint inclination angle) increases from 0 degrees to 90 degrees in the specimens. In addition, with increasing joint distance (d) in the specimens, the failure mode changes to Mode-II. As the non-overlapping length between joints (c) in the specimens increases, the failure mode changes to Mode-IV. The joint geometry has a major influence on the shear strength of the jointed specimens. The peak shear strength of specimens with different joint inclination angles is obtained when alpha = 45 degrees. Additionally, the peak shear strength increases as the joint distance (d) and non-overlapping length (c) increase. (C) 2017 Politechnika Wroclawska. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据