4.6 Article

HCM and DCM cardiomyopathy-linked α-tropomyosin mutations influence off-state stability and crossbridge interaction on thin filaments

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 647, 期 -, 页码 84-92

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.04.002

关键词

In vitro motility; Tropomyosin; Cardiomyopathy; Muscle regulation; Molecular dynamics simulations

资金

  1. NIH [R01HL077280, R01HL123774, R37HL036153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium regulation of cardiac muscle contraction is controlled by the thin-filament proteins troponin and tropomyosin bound to actin. In the absence of calcium, troponin-tropomyosin inhibits myosin-interactions on actin and induces muscle relaxation, whereas the addition of calcium relieves the inhibitory constraint to initiate contraction. Many mutations in thin filament proteins linked to cardiomyopathy appear to disrupt this regulatory switching. Here, we tested perturbations caused by mutant tropomyosins (E40IC, DCM; and E62Q, HCM) on intra-filament interactions affecting acto-myosin interactions including those induced further by myosin association. Comparison of wild-type and mutant human alpha-tropomyosin (Tpm1.1) behavior was carried out using in vitro motility assays and molecular dynamics simulations. Our results show that E62Q tropomyosin destabilizes thin filament off-state function by increasing calcium-sensitivity, but without apparent affect on global tropomyosin structure by modifying coiled-coil rigidity. In contrast, the E4OK mutant tropomyosin appears to stabilize the off-state, demonstrates increased tropomyosin flexibility, while also decreasing calciumsensitivity. In addition, the E4OK mutation reduces thin filament velocity at low myosin concentration while the E62Q mutant tropomyosin increases velocity. Corresponding molecular dynamics simulations indicate specific residue interactions that are likely to redefine underlying molecular regulatory mechanisms, which we propose explain the altered contractility evoked by the disease-causing mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据