4.2 Article

Experimental and numerical investigation on coal drawing from thick steep seam with longwall top coal caving mining

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-018-3421-x

关键词

Longwall top coal caving (LTCC); Steep coal seam; Fragmented coal and rock; Drawing body; Top coal recovery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1361209, 51674264, 51574244]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB227903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steep coal seam mining activities will frequently occur during the next few decades in China. In this study, both experimental and numerical methods are employed to investigate the coal drawing from thick steep seam with longwall top coal caving mining. A series of analyses is performed to investigate the features of the drawing body, the distribution of top coal recovery ratio and the shape of the rock flow under steep conditions. The results indicate that the drawing body of top coal develops prior to upper side of the panel face obviously, and the top coal in the central part of the panel has a higher recovery ratio than that in the lower and upper parts in steep coal seam with caving mining method. The flow paths of the fragmented top coal are nearly straight lines moving towards the drawing window, and the fastest path maintains a constant angle with the plumb line. The spatial shape of the rock flow indicates bidirectional asymmetry, which results from the presence of the shield beam and dip angle of the coal seam; thus, this is the root cause of the appearance of the drawing body's prior development towards the upper side of the panel. The field observation data indicates the same distribution of top coal recovery as that in the physical experiment and numerical simulation. Furthermore, suggested measurements are proposed to improve top coal recovery in steep seam mining based on the engineering practice of Dayuan coal mine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据