4.0 Article

Variations in macrobenthic community at two stations in the southern Yellow Sea and relation to climate variability (2000-2013)

期刊

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH & MANAGEMENT
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 50-59

出版社

MICHIGAN STATE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/14634988.2018.1429785

关键词

macrobenthos; biodiversity; climate variability; Pacific Decadal Oscillation

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA11020303]
  2. Ocean Public Welfare Scientific Research Project, State Oceanic Administration of the PRC [201505004-1]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41176133, 41406157]
  4. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [2015ASKJ01]
  5. Scientific and Technological Innovation Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decadal variations (2000-2013) in the macrobenthic community of the southern Yellow Sea were investigated based on the analysis of the community at two stations located basically along the 70m depth contour. Significant decadal variations in community structure were found through cluster analysis, nMDS ordination and one-way ANOSIM. SIMPER analysis showed that the decadal community variations could be roughly attributed to the decrease of two species of Mollusks (Thyasira tokunagai and Nucula tenuis) and the increase of one echinoderm (Ophiura sarsii vadicola), one polychaete (Notomastus latericeus) and one bivalve (Portlandia japonica) at both stations. Redundancy analysis showed that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the Southern Oscillation Index were significant climate indices influencing the macrobenthic community structure in the southern Yellow Sea. Most of the species collected in 2000s showed a positive correlation with Pacific Decadal Oscillation at both stations, especially for cold water species Thyasira tokunagai, while most species in 2010s were positively correlated to Southern Oscillation Index, e.g. Portlandia japonica and Notomastus latericeus at station 1 and Sigambra bassi and Aricidea fragilis at station 2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据