4.3 Article

How firms export: Processing vs. ordinary trade with financial frictions

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 120-137

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.02.005

关键词

China; Trade regime; Processing trade; Global value chain; Credit constraints; Heterogeneous firms

资金

  1. International Growth Centre (LSE)
  2. Freeman Spogli Institute (Stanford)
  3. Institute for Research in the Social Sciences (Stanford)
  4. ESRC [ES/M010341/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fragmentation of production across borders allows firms to make and export final goods, or to perform only intermediate stages of production by processing imported inputs for re-exporting. We examine how financial frictions affect companies' choice between processing and ordinary trade implicitly a choice of production technology and position in global supply chains and how this decision affects performance. We exploit matched customs and balance sheet data from China, where exports are classified as ordinary trade, import-and-assembly processing trade (processing firm sources and pays for imported inputs), and pure assembly processing trade (processing firm receives foreign inputs for free). Value added, profits, and profitability rise from pure assembly to processing with imports to ordinary trade. However, more profitable trade regimes require more working capital because they entail higher up-front costs. As a result, credit constraints induce firms to conduct more processing trade and pure assembly in particular and preclude them from pursuing higher value-added, more profitable activities. Financial market imperfections thus impact the organization of production across firms and countries and inform optimal trade and development policy in the presence of global production networks. (c) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据