4.5 Article

Dietary pantothenic acid requirement of fingerling Channa punctatus (Bloch) based on growth, feed conversion, liver pantothenic acid concentration and carcass composition

期刊

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 1436-1443

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anu.12680

关键词

Channa punctatus; feed conversion; fingerling; growth; pantothenic acid; requirement

资金

  1. UGC Women [F.15-1/2014-15/PDFWM-2014-15-GE-UTT-28177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 16-week feeding trial was conducted to determine the dietary pantothenic acid requirement of fingerling Channa punctatus. Six casein-gelatin-based diets (450 g/kg CP; 18.39 kJ/g GE) with graded levels of pantothenic acid (0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg/kg diet) were fed to triplicate groups of fish (6.2 +/- 0.71 cm; 4.26 +/- 0.37 g) near to apparent satiation. The growth evaluation in terms of absolute weight gain (AWG), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and protein retention efficiency (PRE) indicated the best performance (p < .05) in fish fed diet containing 30 mg/kg pantothenic acid. Highest haemoglobin, haematocrit and RBCs counts were also obtained in fish fed diet with 30 mg/kg pantothenic acid. Mean cell haemoglobin and mean cell volume were found to be lowest in fish fed pantothenic acid-free diet indicating the anaemia in this group of fish. Superoxidase dismutase and catalase activities of liver tissue were found to improve (p < .05) with the increasing levels of dietary pantothenic acid from 0 to 30 mg/kg. However, liver pantothenic acid concentration responded positively with the increasing levels of pantothenic acid up to 40 mg/kg diet and then stagnation in liver pantothenic acid concentration with the further inclusion of pantothenic acid was recorded. Second-degree polynomial regression analysis of AWG, FCR and PRE exhibited the pantothenic acid requirement at 36.4, 32.8 and 34.7 mg/kg diet, respectively. Data generated during this study would be useful in formulating pantothenic acid-balanced commercial feeds for the intensive culture of this fish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据