4.7 Article

Enhancement of boiling heat transfer using hydrophilic-hydrophobic mixed surfaces: A lattice Boltzmann study

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 490-499

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.105

关键词

Boiling; Hydrophilic-hydrophobic; Mixed wettability; Lattice Boltzmann model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506227]
  2. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [201439]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the boiling heat transfer performance on a type of hydrophilic-hydrophobic mixed surfaces and the underlying enhancement mechanism are numerically investigated using a thermal multiphase lattice Boltzmann model with liquidvapor phase change. The mixed surface is textured with pillars consisting of hydrophilic side walls and hydrophobic tops, in which the combination of mixed wettability and microstructures is applied. It is found that the hydrophobicity of the tops of pillars promotes bubble nucleation and reduces the required wall superheat for the onset of nucleate boiling; however, it also makes the boiling process enter into the film boiling regime at a lower wall superheat. The interaction between the bubbles nucleated at the corners and the bubbles on the tops of pillars is observed during the boiling process on the mixed surface, which speeds up the departure of the bubbles nucleated at the corners. Moreover, comparisons of the heat flux and the heat transfer coefficient are made between textured surfaces with different wettability: homogeneous wettability, heterogeneous wettability, and hydrophilic-hydrophobic mixed wettability, which reveal that increasing the contact angle of the tops of pillars leads to a leftward shift of the boiling curve and a leftward and upward shift of the heat transfer coefficient curve. Furthermore, the effects of the pillar height and width are also studied. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据