4.7 Article

Optimization of thermal management system for Li-ion batteries using phase change material

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 766-778

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.055

关键词

Optimization method; Li-ion battery; Battery thermal management system (BTMS); Phase change material (PCM)

资金

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Program [201704030137]
  2. Applied Science and Technology Project of Guangdong [2016B020243008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an optimization method of Li-ion battery thermal management system (BTMS) using phase change material (PCM). The optimization objective is to minimize the mass of PCM. Two design constraints should be satisfied during the optimization process: (1) the maximum temperature difference in the BTMS should not exceed the threshold value; (2) the desired working time of maintaining the batteries temperature under operation safe temperature should be fulfilled. A case study of the cylindrical BTMS with PCM is selected to illustrate the proposed optimization method. The expanded graphite (EG)/paraffin (PA) composite PCM is used in the BTMS. The thermodynamic mathematical models of the system are solved by the commercial software computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The numerical results are validated against experimental data, and a good agreement has been achieved. During the optimization, four types of BTMS which respectively use single, double, three and four batteries, are considered. The effects of battery radius, gap between neighboring batteries, heat generation rate, and top and bottom PCM thickness on the minimum mass of PCM are analyzed. The optimal radiuses of the PCM unit in different conditions are identified. Results indicate that the proposed optimization method is effective to optimize the BTMS with PCM, which provides guidelines for engineers to conduct the design optimization for similar systems. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据