4.7 Article

Application of response surface method and multi-objective genetic algorithm to configuration optimization of Shell-and-tube heat exchanger with fold helical baffles

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 512-520

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.039

关键词

Shell-and-tube heat exchangers; Fold helical baffles; Triangular leakage zones; Response surface method; Multi-objective genetic algorithm; Empirical correlation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A kind of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold baffles was proposed to eliminate the triangular leakage zones betifeen adjacent baffles. An effective algorithm combing second-order polynomial response surface method and multi-objective genetic algorithm was adopted to study the effect of fold baffle configuration parameters on the performance of flow and heat transfer. The helical angle, overlapped degree and shell-side inlet velocity were chosen as design parameters, and the Nusselt number and shell-side pressure drop were considered as objective functions. The results show that both the Nusselt number and shell-side pressure drop increase with the decrease of helical angle and shell-side inlet velocity, and increase with the increasing overlapped degree. A set of Pareto-optimal points were obtained, and the optimization results illustrate a good agreement with CFD simulation data with the relative deviation less than 3%. And the empirical correlations of Nusselt number and friction coefficient were obtained based on response surface method, the helical angle and overlapped degree were fitted into empirical correlations as correction factors for the first time. It is found that the adjusted coefficient of determination of the Nusselt number and friction coefficient is 0.943 and 0.999, respectively, which illustrate the fitting is correct and reliable. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据