4.7 Article

Numerical study on tab dimension optimization of lithium-ion battery from the thermal safety perspective

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 148-165

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.06.075

关键词

Lithium ion battery safety; Electrochemical-thermal coupling model; Tab dimension optimization; Discharge rate; Thermal behavior

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0100306]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674228]
  3. External Cooperation Program of BIC, CAS [211134KYSB20150004]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2320000036]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2013286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tab is related to the safety of the whole battery, it is crucial to optimize the tab dimension to reduce the battery temperature and improve the safety performance. An electrochemical-thermal coupling model for an 18.5 Ah pouch cell is proposed and the model is validated with experimental data. Using this model, the temperature distribution is investigated at four discharge rates of 0.5 C, 1 C, 2 C and 4 C, respectively. It is found that heat will be accumulated at the positive tab at high discharge rate. Then the thermal behavior is analyzed with different tab dimensions for 4 C discharge rate to determine an optimized tab dimension. The results indicate that widening and thickening the tab appropriately can significantly reduce the battery temperature and lead to more uniform temperature distribution. Eventually the tab with thickness of 0.2 mm, width of 35 mm and height of 20 mm are selected as the optimized tab design for this battery. Afterwards, the heat generation mechanism and characteristics are discussed at the optimized tab dimension, which indicates that the irreversible heat, especially the positive irreversible heat occupies an increasingly dominant position in the total heat generation rate with the increase of the discharge rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据