4.6 Article

An outbreak of myxozoan parasites in farmed freshwater fish Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1818) (Characidae, Serrasalminae) in the Amazon region, Brazil

期刊

AQUACULTURE REPORTS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 31-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.11.004

关键词

Amazon; Tambaqui; Parasite; Myxozoa; Myxosporidians

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) is a native fish species that is farmed most frequently and in the largest quantities throughout Brazil. The high production of this species from fish farms has contributed to the occurrence of emerging parasites, which may compromise fish health and productivity. In a batch of 2500 tambaqui fry acquired for experimental farming procedures in Brazil, a mortality rate of 80% was observed, with the fish swimming erratically and gasping for air at the water surface. From among the specimens that were still alive, 60 individuals were selected at random. Organs or fragments of organs containing lesions and/or cysts were examined under an optical microscope to investigate for the presence of parasitic spores. Of the 60 specimens of tambaqui analyzed, 83.3% were found to be infected in different organs, such as the gills, liver, and gallbladder with myxosporidian species belonging to four genera, namely, Myxobolus, Ellipsomyxa, Henneguya and Thelohanellus. The parasite with the greatest prevalence was Myxobolus sp., located in the gills (70%), followed by Henneguya sp. in the gills region (68.3%), Myxobolus sp. in the liver (63.3%), Thelohanellus sp. in the liver (58.3%), and Ellipsomyxa in the gallbladder (50%). This is the first report of parasitic infection caused by the genera Ellipsomyxa and Thelohanellus in C. macropomum. The present study reported the second incidence of the occurrence of the genus Thelohanellus in South America. This study suggested that the mortality among C. macropomum specimens was caused by the outbreak of myxosporidians. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据