4.7 Article

Novel dual-loop bi-evaporator vapor compression refrigeration cycles for freezing and air-conditioning applications

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 563-582

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.04.085

关键词

Bi-evaporator; Vapor compression refrigeration cycle (VCRC); Throttling loss; Ejector expander; Thermodynamic analysis; Thermoeconomic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cooling production at different temperature levels for various applications has been highlighted in recent years since the produced cooling capacity must be used for different applications to meet all subjects' demands. For this purpose, a novel dual-loop bi-evaporator vapor compression refrigeration cycle is proposed to meet these demands for freezing and air-conditioning applications which can be employed in building sectors. Later, ejector expander is used in place of the expansion valve in the proposed refrigeration system to enhance the performance of this basic system based on the thermodynamics and thermoeconomics viewpoints. Four working fluids of R717, R290, R600a, and R134a are examined where R717 is recommended from thermodynamics, thermoeconomics, and environment viewpoints. The results indicated that using ejector expander in place of the expansion valve and R717 as working fluid, the freezing capacity, air-conditioning capacity, coefficient of performance (COP), exergy efficiency, and sum unit cost of cooling can be increased 10.09%, 1.93%, 22.35%, 57.97%, and 11.03%, respectively. Also, the results indicated that among all components, compressors and evaporators account for the highest exergy destruction rate and investment cost. At last, a comprehensive parametric study is conducted in order to understand the performance characteristics of the proposed refrigeration systems. It is demonstrated that a higher COP and exergy efficiency can be obtained at lower condenser temperatures or higher evaporators temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据