4.7 Article

Numerical analysis of turbulent flow and heat transfer of sinusoidal pulsed jet impinging on an asymmetrical concave surface

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 578-585

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.059

关键词

Pulsating jet; Impingement heat transfer; Sinusoidal pulsation; Asymmetrical concave surface

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, analysis of the turbulent flow and heat transfer under pulsating jet impinging on the asymmetrical concave surface has been performed. An asymmetric concave surface with relative curvatures (D/B) of 20 and 60 has been considered. A sinusoidal pulsation is superposed on the mean velocity for normal impingement on the two-dimensional asymmetrical concave surface. The control-volume method with a SIMPLE algorithm has been used to solve the governing equations. The RNG k-epsilon is employed to model the turbulent behavior of the flow and heat transfer. The effects of amplitude and frequency of pulsation, nozzle-to-surface distance (H/B), relative curvature (D/B), Reynolds number and jet displacement (e/r) on the flow and heat transfer have been investigated. A considerable increase of the instantaneous Nusselt number during the first half of a pulsation cycle is observed in the impingement region. Results show that the use of pulsating jet within the frequency range of 40-160 Hz leads to about 2-8% increase in time-averaged Nusselt number in the wall jet region. The profiles of Nusselt numbers exhibit asymmetrical trends for all Reynolds numbers and jet-to-surface distances (H/B). Numerical results of the present study indicate that the surface with lower relative curvature (D/B = 20) has higher values of the time-averaged Nusselt number. It has been shown that the distribution of time-averaged Nusselt number is affected by the lateral position of the jet (e/r). The optimum lateral distance (e/r = 1.5) is found to increase the averaged Nusselt number by about 5%. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据