4.7 Article

Porous coin-like Fe@MoS2 composite with optimized impedance matching for efficient microwave absorption

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 457, 期 -, 页码 271-279

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.263

关键词

Fe@MoS2 composite; Porous coin-like structure; Impedance matching; Microwave absorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11575084, 51602153]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic metallic materials compounded with dielectric loss materials are promising for efficient microwave absorption as a result of the synergistic effect between dielectric loss and magnetic loss, as well as the optimized impedance matching. In this paper, porous coin-like structured Fe@MoS2 composite has been fabricated via solvothermal method accompanied by subsequent heat treatment under H-2/Ar atmosphere. The structure and morphology of as-prepared Fe@MoS2 composite indicates that MoS2 nanosheets with the two-dimensional (2D) structure are well dispersed on the porous coin-like Fe micro-sheets to form a core-shell structure. Particularly, the addition of MoS2 regulates the permittivity as well as improves the impedance matching of the Fe@MoS2 composite. The as-prepared composite shows efficient microwave absorption properties with the maximum effective absorption bandwidth (reflection loss below -10 dB) of about 4.73 GHz (11.13-15.86 GHz) at the corresponding coating thickness of 2.0 mm, accompanied by the minimum reflection loss of about -37.02 dB. When the calcination temperature increases to 650 degrees C, the effective microwave absorption frequency band shifts to the lower frequency (9.91-14.19 GHz) with the minimum reflection loss of about -35.5 dB under the coating thickness of 2.0 mm. Considering the efficient microwave attenuation, the as-fabricated porous coin-like Fe@MoS2 composite can be a hopeful candidate in the field of microwave absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据